Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Not a Feather, but a Dot


This week I am pleased to introduce Teju Prasad, an independent documentary filmmaker.  In this guest post he discusses why he decided to make the film Not a Feather, but a Dot. Please welcome him.

First, thanks to Dianne Hagan and the About Race blog for the opportunity to share my thoughts on my independent documentary film Not a Feather, but a Dot, that delves into the history, perception, and evolution of the Indian community in the US.
I'll start the post off by recounting an exchange at a post-screening Q & A:
Viewer: “Thank you for making the film, it’s great to see a positive side of Hindus when all we see is violence in the media.”
Me: (confused look): “Oh? Such as?”
Viewer: “Oh, like the Taliban.”
Me: (awkward pause, then awkward smile)*
*Note: The Taliban is an ultra-fundamentalist Muslim group, and has no connection with Hindus or Hinduism (other than their vitriolic hatred of them).
I repeat this exchange from time to time, usually when I get asked the question, "Why did you make the film?" Especially when the question is asked with the subtext, "Is a film like this necessary?"
I believe it quickly demonstrates the level of missing knowledge out there in the world, but as I've learned through the course of making the film and subsequent screenings at libraries, universities, and other venues, knowledge and information is only as good as people's motivation to learn. In some cases, that means having their previous conclusions challenged. In a way, that's the goal of any film: to reach audiences that would otherwise not have paid attention to the topic.
"Why did I make the film?" is the most common question I'm asked after a screening, so I think it'll make a good subject for a blog post.  First, I wanted a resource that was thorough, succinct, and accessible. Like many other Americans of foreign "ethnic" origin, the void of knowledge we're met with can be quite staggering. With the growth of documentary films over the past decade, it was a great vehicle to reach people. A film that could be used in schools, libraries, or just be part of someone’s DVD or digital film collection. There are many great documentaries out there that deal with immigration and religion in depth, but none that I felt really synthesized all of this into something accessible. I wanted to provide a starting point for further exploration. I wanted people to learn something, but not necessarily feel as if it were a boring, purely academic exercise.
The second reason was a bit more nebulous and open-ended. I wanted to ask the question, “What’s it mean to be Indian-American?” but really, at a basic level, ask the question, “What’s it mean to be [insert ethnic background here]-American?”
I recall a discussion in high school with a friend that occurred on an annual event called "Diversity Day." We formed groups and discussed our various origins, and the goal, I presume, was to appreciate and celebrate diversity. My friend pulled no punches in his criticism of the event, saying that such things were "reserved for the home" and that we should all focus on "being American." I asked him then with my logical, computer science, engineering mind, "Aren't you then defining ‘Americannness’ as a negative, as if being American is the lack of being anything else?" I had him stumped for a second. I felt very proud.
The discussion stuck with me because I found myself buying into this kind of dichotomy, well, pretty much my entire life. In the film I try to deal with the question “Will this dichotomy ever change, or will it always exist?” I wanted to ask, “What's it mean to be Indian-American?" from the perspective of, “Will the meaning change?” and “Is the end goal to have it not mean anything at all?” 
To do that, I set out to recount how the perceptions and state of the Indian-American community has changed over the past 100 years. Then I moved to a discussion of the immigrant experience and the psychological nature of stereotyping. What I found out was, as more versions of an immigrant group become known, the stereotypes were harder to sustain. Seems pretty obvious. 
But that begged a very “chicken and egg” inquiry: Was it incumbent on us as an immigrant group to create these alternate “versions” of ourselves to alter the stereotypes? Or were the stereotypes and prejudices (whether external or internal) what needed to change in order for us to create an alternate reality? And if they changed, what was the "critical-mass" point when society, en masse, would internally and collectively say, "Alright, this stereotypical association is no longer valid?"
I believe the film asks these questions. It shows the ways change has occurred. For example, when I was growing up, I remember seeing Indians on television in stereotypical roles. Now I see Indian characters with deeper back-stories that demonstrate obstacles and behaviors. There you have it, change. But the film also compares the political aspirations and obstacles of people like Dalip Singh Saund, the first Indian-American congressmen, and present-day Indian-Americans in politics, dealing with similar struggles. Is there change there? Well, maybe not as much.
It’s a question I personally go back and forth with, and I hope that watching films like Not a Feather, but a Dot will help answer.
Not a Feather, but a Dot is scheduled to screen on March 28th, in Durham, NC at the Southpoint Cinemas 17. All tickets MUST be reserved online to confirm the screening.
Preview the trailer and book tickets online here by March 21st.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Inaugural Revelation


"We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths – that all of us are created equal – is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth."
~ President Barack Hussein Obama, January 21, 2013

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.
~ Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
I was so discouraged by the news prior to this great day in our country, a day that celebrates the 2nd inauguration of our first mixed race president and a day that honors the great Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I couldn’t write for weeks: my brain hardened to stone, my emotions dove deep inside, and my creativity passed out cold. But yesterday the dam broke as I anticipated this day and what it means to all of us. I started writing again, and I had a seven-page rant about the ills I witnessed in the news. I won’t burden you with it. I realized, as I watched President Obama’s inauguration speech today, it only adds to the cacophony. Instead I share this with you.
America is a great country. The majority of Americans denounced inequality and support equality. Even though there are those who want to keep the status quo where white Americans have an advantage over people of color and men have an advantage over women and heterosexuals have an advantage over LGBT people, most Americans see how that hurts all of us. They understand that inclusion is better, that we are all created equal, and we are all in this together. They want change, just as they did four years ago, only now, stronger than ever, we will press forward in a progressive direction while honoring the original ideas that formed this country.
We are not a country of makers and takers; we are not a country of only white people or only rich people. We are a country that is made up of diverse people and ideas, and we must look to the strengths each of us can contribute toward a better life for all of us, not just the elite or the few.
Though there are people who still seek to protect the old way of life where oppression, prejudice, and power imbalance ruled, they are the minority, a loud minority, certainly, but definitely a minority. The rest of us have spoken in unison and maybe, for the first time since the Civil Rights movement, just as loudly. President Obama has spoken, as our highest leader, most eloquently, about our country, where we have been, and where we are headed, because he listened to us.
There is still a lot of bad out there: people who violently disagree with equality, people who want to benefit at the expense of others, and natural and manmade catastrophes and disasters. There is a lot of work yet to be done, hard work, but we must keep moving forward. I was discouraged, but not now. I was cynical, but now I have hope and belief that we can do it.
I believe that when everyone feels a part of our country, where not one person feels disenfranchised by an uncaring system, and when we can all have a seat at the table of progress, some of the hatred and violence will go away. The playing field will be level, and all people will have the opportunity to find the best position to play in their lives. People will have safety nets that ensure, if life knocks them down, they have the resources to stand back up and get back in the game, and if they can't get back in the game, they will not be left behind. Finally, fifty years after Dr. King spoke of his dream, we are close to being judged by the content of our characters rather than our gender, race, or who we choose to share our lives with.
Thank you, President Obama, and all those who came before you, people like President Abraham Lincoln and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who saw a clear way forward and sacrificed their lives to point us in the right direction.
I admit that I get discouraged. I feel sad when I see injustice, inequality, and elitism. But then I remember that things can be different.
Change is not easy, but, together, we can get there. Let’s hope that some of the 47% of America who chose not to reelect President Obama, who feel their concerns are not being heard, will be willing to sit with us, engage in civil discourse, and find a way. Together we can do it.
(ABC News)

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Decoding Hate


Hate groups in our country continue to thrive. They may market themselves as religious conservatives, fiscal conservatives or even protectors of Western civilization or white culture, but what they do is promote hate, insularity, and divisiveness. Jared Taylor, a fundraiser for YWC (Youth for Western Civilization), was quoted as saying, “When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization – any civilization – disappears.” 
Kevin DeAnna, YWC leader, wrote in a letter that “radical multiculturalism” and the “far left…destroy our people and our culture.”
He was also quoted as saying, “Even if you prove to me…that [curtailing illegal immigration] would hurt the economy, I would still be opposed to immigration because it’s about our dispossession as a people.” (The Intelligence Report, Fall 2011, Issue 143)
I think America was preserved and pristine at the hands of its first natives who helped the white man so he would not die in the harsh conditions during the early years of settlement, even as the settlers engaged in genocide. I think America was built on the backs of slaves, most of whom were African or descendants of Africans, and the Chinese and the Irish. It was built on the backs of immigrant women and children who lived in tenement housing and worked in factories where they were locked in and forced to work in inhuman conditions. It was built on migrant workers, mainly black and Hispanic, who still work the fields today and live in poverty and squalor. Liberals helped the progress of our country by supporting social programs, such as social security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, and Headstart programs. These programs equalize and diminish the difference between haves and have-nots. They also allow our country to tap into the vast potential of those who may not have the access and resources to reach their full potential by giving them avenues to do so. Helping those who need help, who need not just bootstraps with which to pull themselves up, but the boots that are connected to the bootstraps, without regard to race, gender or ethnicity, helps all of us in ways that most of us take for granted.
Fear of change and loss of power are what drive most of the hate groups today and have always been the driving force behind them. These groups use words that have coded meanings and instigate, support and perpetuate violence. Either their members feel dispossessed because they assume they are entitled to a piece of the American pie, or they already wield power and wealth and fear losing it.  I don’t care if they want to hate, and I don’t hate them in return. They have the freedom to feel and think as they do, but they don’t have the right to impose their rhetoric, beliefs and actions on others.
They could not exist if racism did not still exist, if all the isms did not still exist. Yet here I am imposing my own beliefs on you, dear reader. But I am only trying to say that we are all equal, more alike than different in our needs and aspirations, but diverse in our approaches and perspectives. Our different ingredients make up the American pie and there are enough slices for all of us.
I’m not always so serious. I’m actually quite funny. Read another excerpt from my memoir, Shades of Tolerance, below, and maybe it will make you smile.

(Excerpt from Chapter 7 The Ubiquitous They, Shades of Tolerance: A Biracial Love Story)
Dad picked me up at the Schenectady bus station, a tiny room surrounded by windows. He drove down Central Avenue toward Colonie, and neither of us spoke. I watched the buildings and cars and people out the side window, afraid to ask how Ma was doing.
I do not remember much about my stay those few days except that Ma was released from the hospital and she told me to go back to school and finish the semester. I was angry and embarrassed I had called all my professors, my voice shaking with grief, telling them I had to go home because my mother was near death. Now I would be back for final exams after all. I worried about taking exams after such a disruption. I worried the faculty would think I had lied or exaggerated. I considered whether or not Ma had exaggerated her illness or got sick on purpose, so I would come home. I wondered if her illness was my fault, just as she had accused me of causing Dad’s second heart attack the summer before.
I spent the bus ride back to Syracuse with my forehead pressed against the window, deep in thought, watching each mile marker streak by the window. Just as I had stopped drinking a few years before, I decided now to stop going back to the source of my feeling abandoned and anxious.
Ronald met me at the bus station in Syracuse and walked with me back to the dorm, carrying my bag. When we got to my room, I told him what I thought about the whole ride back in the bus. “I’m not going back to Albany this summer,” I said.
“Where are you going to stay? Where will you work?” he asked.
“I’ll figure it out,” I said.
“Don’t do anything rash,” he said, “It’s only a few months.”
“I can’t stay in that house again.”
Copy Services at Bird Library had a new supervisor. Maxine had moved to Technical Services and Mary had taken her job. Mary was almost six feet tall, a linebacker with long, fine blonde hair and pale blue eyes. Her voice sounded like a whisper. She had a twin sister nicknamed Bug who looked exactly like her, unless you studied the shapes of their faces, and you realized that Bug’s face was softer at the edges and smaller than Mary’s. Mary and Bug made all their own dresses: the same empire dress pattern with long sleeves, but in different solids and prints. The personalized license plate of their shared station wagon announced their avocation: QUILTERS.
“Oh, your poor mother,” I had said to Mary upon realizing that the person I was waving to on campus was Bug and not Mary, and that was why she ignored me.
‘Why do you feel sorry for my mother?” Mary had asked.
“To have twins for her firstborn. It must have been very difficult for her as a new mother,” I said.
One day she would laugh at me, looking at my belly circumference that nearly matched my height, when I, too, would have twins for my firstborn. A few weeks before I went on maternity leave, Mary would throw her arm around my waist, heft me up like a sack of grain, and walk across a runnel of rainwater rushing towards the street drain.  All in good humor, she and Bug made quilts and stuffed teddy bears for my set of twins.
I told Mary my plight when I went to pick up my paycheck.
“I have one more summer position open,” she said, “You and Ron can work all summer, full-time hours.”
“Great!”  I said. I called Peggy that evening and begged to use her spare room in the house she and Dawson had just bought with another couple. It was an old two-family, built in the 1920s, down in the ghetto on the south side of Syracuse.  Peggy, Dawson and baby Liza lived in the first-floor flat and the other couple and their baby of the same age lived in the second-floor flat. Peggy said she would be happy to have me stay.
Even though I had rushed home to see Ma in the hospital, I had kept conversation short and directed at her health. I did not want to call her to tell her I would not be home for the summer, so I sent her a letter. Syracuse became my hometown for the next thirty years. Ma would fight to keep Andy home, and he obliged, if only because he had no other plan. She had called Andy and me “the two little ones.” She never wanted us to leave, and now she was angry that she could not make me stay, could not make me choose her over Ronald. Syracuse, already home to Peggy and Rocco, had stolen another child.
Mary and Bug lived in the Valley section of Syracuse not even a mile from Peggy’s house, and they beeped their horn each morning to let me know they had arrived to pick me up. Ronald walked to work from his Euclid Avenue home. He and I worked together, leaving at noon to wander down to Marshall Street and the Burger King at lunchtime.  After lunch we would stand side by side, working to get the copy requests completed.
The Copy Center was walled by glass that looked out on Periodicals. Often as we stood at the copy machines, we watched one of the Library administrators walking by, his head turned in our direction. One day he slipped in the front door and told Mary he wanted to talk to her.
Mr. Bullard came up to Mary’s chest. He was middle-aged and balding, his suit a grayish green. Rumor was his hero was Winston Churchill. He had read every one of his books and all biographies about him. He must have fancied himself Churchill-like, his finger resting in the watch pocket of his vest. He also imagined himself as a wise and desirable mentor to young female employees in his charge. I thought he was creepy.
“I’ve had complaints,” he said to Mary.
“Complaints?” Mary echoed. She dwarfed him and her usually soft features looked menacing.
“Those two can’t work together,” he said, nudging his chin toward Ronald and me, standing behind copy machines side by side.
“Who can’t work together?” Mary asked, her voice losing its whispery quality. Ronald and I looked at each other then back to the scene playing in front of us. We kept the copy machines humming, turning pages of the books we were copying from, flipping the books over and flattening their spines so the copies would not be black on the bound edge of the pages. We did this without looking down, our eyes fixed on Mary and Bullard.
“One of them has to work in Technical Services,” he said, pointing at us.
“They are my students,” Mary said, leaning toward Bullard. He looked down at the counter separating them.
“It’s voluntary. Otherwise, someone will have to be fired,” Bullard said, “I told you people have complained.”
Mary picked up a ruler from her desk. She used it to slap her palm to emphasize each word. “Who complained?” she said again, slapping the ruler twice.
“People,” Bullard said, “I can’t say who.”
“The ubiquitous they,” she said, slapping her palm again on each word, her voice seeming to bounce off the walls and glass.
Bullard took a step backward. I looked out the glass into the Periodicals Department and noticed all eyes, students and staff, were turned to Copy Services. Everyone had heard Mary’s whispery voice turn dangerous.
“And what did they say their complaint was?” she said, continuing to slap her palm with the ruler. Now it was a constant slap, slap, slap.
Bullard stared at the ruler. I think Mary was imitating some nuns she knew, or at least one or two that I had run into during Sunday school classes, and I was even surer that Bullard had attended Catholic school based entirely on his expression and body posture.
“I can’t say,” he said, his voice faltering. Then he straightened his spine and looked up at her.
“I’ve spoken,” he said. “I want an answer within the hour. Someone is working out back.” He turned and reached for the door.
“Oh, you’ll get an answer,” Mary said.
“No,” I said, staring at Bullard, my copy machine now silent. “I’ve got an answer now. I quit!”
“You can’t quit,” Bullard said, turning to look at me.
“No, she can’t quit,” Ronald said, “ because I quit.”
“I still quit,” I said.
Bullard stood rooted in his spot, his hand still reaching for the door handle, staring at us.
“I quit, too!” said Steve. Steve was the night manager at Copy Services. He had only started his shift an hour earlier. Wispy and bespectacled, he sat behind the microfilm reader/printer and it seemed we had all forgotten he was there.
“Are the ubiquitous they being hired on as my new staff?” Mary asked, the ruler slapping at a fast and furious pace now.
Bullard dropped his hand to his side and turned to face Mary.
“Okay, drop it for now, but don’t think this is over,” he said. He quickly turned, opened the door and slammed it behind him.
We all watched Bullard through the glass as he marched across the carpeted floor in Periodicals and up the center stairway. When we could no longer see his feet, students and staff in Periodicals started applauding and we burst out laughing.