Sunday, July 14, 2013

To Trayvon, with Love


Dear Trayvon,
I am so sorry that we let you down on the night you died. I am so sorry that you did not receive justice in our court system.
I signed a petition seventeen months ago when I first heard about your death, your murder, Trayvon. I wrote five posts about you in the weeks after, trying to sort out just how America found itself at this place in our history where people not only carry guns but use them and then get away with murder, and at this place where being a black male is STILL dangerous and often fatal. Then I spent the last five weeks following the trial as if my own life depended on it, and, Trayvon, my life did depend on it.
We got home last night and the first thing I did was turn on the TV and flip through the news channels looking for an update on whether or not the jury had come to a verdict, and within minutes I saw the breaking news banner at the bottom of the screen. Ronald and I held our breaths while the court reassembled, all except for your parents, and I felt their absence keenly though I understood why they were not there. I know I would not have been able to hear those words as your parent.
I could only shake my head as the verdict was announced.
“Five white women,” Ronald said. “I told you they’d acquit.”
I hadn’t wanted to believe that the all female jury would acquit George Zimmerman. I wanted to believe, all along, that George Zimmerman would stand up in court and ask for the lies to stop, as first his mother, then his uncle, then his father testified that the screaming on the 911 call was his voice and not yours. I wanted him to admit that he had made terrible, fatal choices that night based on his own biases and hatred and that those choices will forever echo through history and the universe as a reminder of our inhumanity.
But Ronald thought I was naïve.
I began to cry when he told me there is no hope for black people in America. There is nothing left to do, nowhere to go, he said, because nothing will change. I believe so much of what he says, because he has such wisdom about these things, but I know in this case, Trayvon, it is his survival as a black man in this awful, racist country, in spite of his many brushes with other people’s potentially fatal decisions, in stark contrast to your short-lived life, that has left him full of despair.
“We can’t give up,” I said, sobs choking my words.
And I won’t, Trayvon, because you can’t have died in vain.  For every George Zimmerman out there, let there be three or four or eight or thousands who learn how to see you, and all black boys and men, as the person you are, not just the color of your skin. Let there be ten or a hundred or a thousand or millions who know that you belong and have a right to belong and will fight for your right to belong at the store, in the rain, on the walkway, in the gated community your father lived in, in Sanford, in Florida, in the United States of America. You belonged here. You had a right to be here. George Zimmerman was in the wrong place and doing the wrong thing. He acted like a thug that night, because thugs are people who have ill intent and who carry weapons to hurt and kill others, and it doesn’t matter what their skin color is or what clothes they wear, because that isn’t what makes them thugs.
We failed you, Trayvon. Not because your parents didn’t talk to you the way my husband Ronald talked to our daughters, just as his father talked to him and his siblings, and his grandfather talked to his father.
“You can’t do what they do,” Ronald told our daughters. And I know your parents told you that, too, because they were good and loving parents and they wanted to keep you safe from a country that hates you because of the color of your skin.
We failed you, because we allowed the rising tide of racism to crash over our country unabated. We failed you, because we let gun legislation through that supports irresponsible gun ownership. We failed you, because we sat on the laurels of the Civil Rights Movement and grew complacent. We failed you, because George Zimmermans exist everywhere in this country and will continue to profile black boys like you and shoot to kill them.
But we won’t fail your memory, Trayvon. You will be remembered, as the Martin family lawyer, Benjamin Trump, said last night, and “forever remain in the annals of history next to Medgar Evers and Emmett Till as symbols for the fight for equal justice for all.”
Know, Trayvon, that there are white people who get it. Not all of them, not even half of them, probably not even a third of them, but there are white people, like me, who understand what it is to be black in America because we have been fortunate or unfortunate enough to experience what you experienced as, in my case, a wife and mother and daughter-in-law and sister-in-law and aunt and friend.
I, for one, will pledge to fight on your behalf.
I just signed a petition for the federal government to re-open their suspended investigation. I wrote the following comment:
This is a socially important case. It cannot be the precedent that it is okay to shoot and kill black boys because they are perceived through the lens of racism. Trayvon Martin did nothing different than millions of other boys his age do every day -- he went out to buy a snack and was talking on his cell phone as he walked back home. He had a right to be there. George Zimmerman had no right to profile him from a distance, pursue him, not identify himself [to Trayvon], and then shoot Trayvon at point blank range in the heart. Please investigate this fatal act that denied Trayvon his fundamental civil rights and his life.
Know that men like my husband, though crushed by the disrespect and humiliation they have endured in their lifetimes as they trail-blazed the way toward equality, will continue their fight for justice, even at their personal peril.  They will push through their depression and weariness because they don’t want you to live the life they did. They want it to be better, like when my father-in-law moved from Sanford, FL (where relatives still live) up north so his children would not grow up under Jim Crow laws.
And white people like me will be at their sides, just like whites marched beside Martin Luther King, Jr.  We know it is wrong. We believe you when you tell us how it is for you as a black boy living in a racist country. We’ve even experienced it vicariously, like when the Southern white man stood in our garage when we had a neighborhood yard sale a few weeks back and told us how all blacks live off the government. He said that standing in the garage of our newly constructed home, looking directly at our Infiniti G37S parked in the garage along with Ronald’s motorcycle, and our CRV and our daughter’s Mazda 3 parked at the curb so our driveway would fit the lawn tractor, refrigerator, and chandelier we were selling. I guess they were all bought with food stamps, Trayvon, because, according to him and many other white people, all black people are on the dole and too lazy to work. I slipped into the house, and Ronald told the white man, “You have to go now.”
I wish someone had been there the night George Zimmerman decided you didn’t belong in his neighborhood, even though it was obviously multi-cultural and multi-racial. I wish just one person had stepped out of his or her house and said to Zimmerman, “You have to go now. Let this boy return safely home. He belongs here.”
Trayvon, we will continue the fight for the right of all Americans to belong, to be equal under the law, and to be judged by one’s character and not a physical feature or clothing. We cannot rip racism from a person’s brain, but we can fight the good fight and remove the racism from our institutions and our systems and our laws. One day, people like George Zimmerman will be just a memory, but unlike your memory, we will not remember his name but only his deed that reminded us how far we had to go.

With love and hope,
Dianne

Trayvon, for your parents and your brother and for all of us who love you and who won't forget you, this is how you will be remembered, in this photo taken just ten days before you were murdered

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Here We Go Again – Elbert Guillory (R) Switches Parties


I am so pleased to introduce Melissa Prunty-Kemp, M.A., M.F.A. I invited some other writers to share their race and culture experiences, and Melissa is the second writer to guest post. If we cannot view our experiences through the lens of honesty and forthrightness, we cannot begin to heal our shameful history of racism and look forward to a new unified America.

Perhaps recent storms, bridge collapses or the trials of Jody Arias and George Zimmerman distracted you from this recent earth-shaking announcement by former Democratic Senator Elbert Guillory, now new R-Opelousas, Louisiana; that he switched parties and is now a Republican.  Not only has Guillory experienced this “Apostle Paul” moment, you should as well, especially if you are a Black American.

In this statement originally sent to me from a Facebook friend as a YouTube video, Guillory purports to show many misguided African Americans “the way.” Fortunately for me especially (because I hate video), I found a transcript of Guillory’s speech.

If you are a person who believes political parties have any real purpose different from each other (I do not—they all want the same thing in my opinion, which is security for monetary and military interests but they each have a different method of fostering that security), then it makes sense for you to pay attention to what the parties do and who is affiliated with which party.  If you think race has something to do with how the parties operate, then it makes sense to pay attention to which racial/ethnic groups affiliate with which parties.  I, however, believe that political parties, like race, socio-economic status, age, gender and other demographic delimiters serve one purpose only—to distract and divide people so that they never pay attention to the real problem—the wizard behind the curtain.

So what’s Guillory’s premise in his speech?  He believes the Democratic Party is in favor of “public” welfare and that the public who receives such is being insulted with it.  He states, “You see, in recent history the Democrat Party has created the illusion that their agenda and their policies are what’s best for black people.”  The operative words in this sentence and in the whole argument, which weakens it and makes it irrelevant, are “recent history.”  What’s recent is a matter of when you are born.  My son and my own “recent history” are radically different.  It amazes me that Guillory could be his age and make the statements he’s making, considering the “recent history” he experienced in Louisiana.

He could be right with the rest of his contention, however: there is no shortage of parties, groups, doctors, politicians and a host of others who know “what’s best” for black and any other people, whites included.  I’d define that as “parochialism” or “paternalism,” both of which are faulty.  It presupposes the belief that ethnic groups and their individual members are incapable of deciding what’s best for themselves and that they need the great hand of someone smarter than they to do it for them.  Guillory should be slapped for continuing to perpetuate such a statement.  I definitely don’t need anyone to tell me what’s best for me.  My brain and critical thinking function quite well, thank you.

Guillory’s speech then continues to posit that Republicans are much more humane and have been such since 1854.  Presumably, he thinks they are the best party to know what’s “best for the people.” He then goes on to prove the accuracy of this statement.  It would take me a week to demonstrate how wrong-headed it is for any group of people in the USA to discuss the humanity of Democratic or Republican parties toward minority groups or women. We could all be smashed flat by the weight of publications to the contrary.  Both parties are guilty at various times in history of inhumanity and grand hypocrisy from the beginnings of this country until today, and the same will be the case tomorrow.  Individuals do and have done great things.  The parties often have not.

Some of Guillory’s proof of the great good will toward blacks at the hands of Republicans is pretty shaky:  Abe Lincoln, while a great president, was no saint.  Most people know these days that the abolition of slavery was not his purpose in the Civil War, nor anyone’s purpose.  It was a convenient and happy circumstance for slaves that Emancipation became a political tool, and most of them were grateful for freedom.  But if you read deeply, you will find that some were not and were “happy” with the “security” of their slave existence - wrong-headed and misguided—yes. 

But if you consider that a slave was a person ripped from their home at the hands of their own countrymen and relocated several thousand miles away across an ocean which they (perhaps) miraculously managed to survive being transported over; if you consider that a slave might have been purposefully BRED here after the slave trade was abolished (after all, why engage in the expense of transport or even of purchase on these shores when a slave owner could just make as many of his own slaves as he desired); it’s not difficult to imagine that one tortured and terrified in this manner wouldn’t want to be released to “freedom” into the wilds of an unknown country never travelled, with little or no idea really how to negotiate travel, not to mention all those murderous whites who might kill you still (reference the 1890s, Red Summer of 1913, the rise of the KKK and other hate groups, and subsequent Jim Crow Laws.) 

Guillory’s next example of Republican largesse is “voting rights.”  This is another problematic issue as stated by Guillory, who says, “It was the Republicans in Congress who authored the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments giving former slaves citizenship, voting rights, and due process of law.”  Republicans did sponsor the 14th Amendment, but it was in reaction to the Supreme Court’s (also mostly Republican) Dred Scott Decision.  So in fact, it wasn’t Dred Scott himself that was the reason for the 14th Amendment; it was quelling a corrupt Supreme Court (see Anastaplo’s Lincoln biography, 1999.)

It’s also well worth noting that the 1965 Voting Rights Act wouldn’t have been necessary had the first rights to vote been enforced.  The 1965 Voting Rights Act was a bi-partisan sponsored bill and signed into law by a democratic president.  Guillory writes, “It was the Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who championed the Civil Rights Act of 1957, but it was Democrats in the Senate who filibustered the bill.” Eisenhower, a Republican, was a great president, but unfortunately, he couldn’t get the Civil Rights Act passed.  It would take the bully-muscle of a Democrat to do that.  Had not Kennedy and Johnson been in office, and had not Johnson been in need of establishing his might, I don’t think the act would have been passed without much more bloodshed. Consider the numbers reported of blacks mostly and some whites who were killed or injured from 1954 – 1968 during the Civil Rights movement (89 murdered and 176 injured that I could find from various sources). Had not Johnson intervened in 1964 when he did, I really believe things might have devolved into all-out civil war or another instance of genocide in the USA.

Guillory switches in his speech at this point to talk about government.  He writes, “You see, at the heart of liberalism is the idea that only a great and powerful big government can be the benefactor of social justice for all Americans.”  What exactly is “big government?”  Where is it actually stated what size our government should be other than what the constitution implies, keeping in mind that times and situations call for adjustments.  Our country has chosen to use government as a means of operation.  We have 315 million+ people in the US as of December 2012.  Who and how are we to manage all those people and their needs without government of a reasonable size to perform operations? 

We’re doing a terrible job at actually managing the needs of the people.  Reference the recent bridge collapses as one example of how well we are not doing.  According to the USDA, 47,558,164 Americans, or roughly 15% of our total population, are receiving food stamps, an increase of 2.8% since last year. They are not having their needs managed either. I promise you, none of this 15% woke up and decided they wanted to try to feed their families on $45 - $100 a month.

Yes, of course, Americans tend to complain about “social programs,” which is ridiculous, especially since many of those programs are benefitting the people who complain.  Take welfare for instance.  The current statistics show that there’s a 1% difference in the numbers of blacks and whites who receive welfare at around 39.8%.  Only around 16% of Latinos receive it.  We spend
·      $139.1 billion on welfare and our current total spending budget is $3,803.4 billion.
·      3.65% of our budget on welfare. 
·      $916.1 billion on healthcare
·      $901.4 on defense
·      $875.3 on pensions. 
I hope you see a problem here.  Less spending on social programs (almost none) and more spending on defense and healthcare. If you don’t eat well, you will become sick sooner or later. We could fund the welfare budget 8 times over with the defense or even the pension budget, and subsequently reduce spending on healthcare if our government had different priorities. We will spend ever-increasing amounts on healthcare at this rate due to our inability or disregard for our responsibility as humans to care for people who make up our society.  Or, we will just decide to let people die in the streets.

Guillory targets welfare as a program intended to keep blacks in poverty and not lift them from it.  He writes, “Programs such as welfare, food stamps, these programs aren’t designed to lift black Americans out of poverty, they were always intended as a mechanism for politicians to control the black community.”  Since Guillory himself is black, I presume this is why he has only talked about blacks in this sentence.  However, his contention is true for ALL people using the service.  It’s not meant to be a way of life but a bridge to a better life.  But, what does one do if the bridge is collapsed, has been blown up, or simply doesn’t exist where you live?  Consider here the demise of manufacturing in America.  Some of the arguments heard are that skilled laborers should train for other jobs. What if those other jobs aren’t there? 

Here’s Guillory’s one (mostly) accurate statement: “The idea that blacks, or anyone for that matter, need the government to get ahead in life is despicable” (2013, para. 6).  I agree.  However, as we have allowed ourselves to devolve over time, and given in fully to our terminal interest in profiteering, there’s just too much money to be made by having people dependent on government, one way or another, whether it’s for job creation, protection of our finance and banking system, oversight of our corporation operations, and the list goes on.  Things should not be this way.  I’m not a happy capitalist; this and other economic systems, along with individual greed and desire for power, corrupt all that should be had in any economic system.  None of them work as long as power-mongers are in charge.

Guillory mentions how “freedom” is tossed around and has lost its punch.  I agree.  I also think that virtually no American wants real freedom.  And nowhere on the planet does true freedom, or, for that matter, democracy, actually exist. We have pseudo versions of these ideas. Freedom is regularly suspended in situations like these:  (1) you are a group of youth, regardless of race, who are congregating and making some other people nervous because you are congregating; (2) you are a homeowner who needs a mortgage modification, but Bank of America and/or Chase are practicing fraud which impedes your progress and can substantially affect your freedom to resolve your financial situation; (3) you’re a black youth [read and then fill in the blank of the exhaustive list of things that can impede your freedom that you actually have no control over, like being shot inside your house from a bullet meant for someone else, or being forced through hazing into activities that lead to your death (definitely not only occurring in the black community)]; (4) being hit and killed as a child while sitting in church from celebratory gunfire; (5) your government is afraid of terrorists and thus decides it needs to monitor and record all communications of all Americans.  This list goes on.

In short, Guillory is free to choose whatever party he wants and to switch at will.  That he does so has absolutely no bearing on what I believe will ultimately save this country, and that has nothing to do with politics.  In fact, when we pay less attention to politics and more attention to compassionate humane treatment of everyone, regardless of color, creed, gender or party affiliation, we might have a chance.  We need a great deal more respect for difference. 

In fact, it never ceases to amaze me how this nation, of all nations, can be so recalcitrant and xenophobic about difference.  The indigenous peoples in America are not the ones currently in charge—the start of the problem.  Perhaps it’s time that the USA should split up into smaller units where people of like minds can live in peace.  If you want to hate whomever, not feed whomever, keep your women barefoot and pregnant and your citizenry wholly ignorant about certain things, there ought to be a place for you in these United States.  You should be able to practice what you want, and you should NOT be able to impede me from doing the same.  In your area, your own individual citizens will easily abide by the cultural will of the people in your area, or they will have to leave and go to another one where people live as desired.  If I want to play the violin, be gay, levitate the Pentagon, manufacture, drink and sell raw milk and non-GMO vegetables, consume no pharmaceuticals, drink clean water, write poetry, smoke weed, have group sex, watch porn, gamble, drink and do drugs, have academic conversations, write books, I should be able to do that with like-minded people and not be attacked or impressed into behavior I don’t espouse.  If I want to be Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Yoruba, Wiccan, you should be able to be so and not have others attack you for it.  That’s what America is supposed to be.  So we waste our time trying to police others into being like us because in fact, that’s against the principles of freedom.  I hope America shits or gets off the pot.  Either be the free society your constitution says you are and work out a reasonable way to do so, or stop lying and be the fascist, communist, dictatorial beast this country is fast becoming. 


Melissa Prunty Kemp is a 27-year English professor and former General Education department chair.  Her education background is varied—she earned a B.A. in Psychology from Hollins University in Roanoke, VA, and was the second African American to earn a M.A. in English from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, VA. She studied Early American and Harlem Renaissance literature at Kent State University.  Her final degree, a Master in Fine Arts Creative Writing, was earned at from Queens University of Charlotte, NC. 

She wrote her first poems at age 13, which were published in the junior high literary magazine, The Bagpipe, and in yearbooks.  She says, “I knew no other way at that time to extol the love I had for an unknown Cheyenne Indian in Wyoming; a poem had to be it.  I have been writing and attempting to publish ever since.”  Her love of writing drives her to write and publish academic and technical articles and online publications about art, race, politics, black history and local history of African Americans in Salem and Roanoke, VA.  Her poetry and articles have appeared in The Journal of Women and Language, California Poetry Quarterly, We Used To Be Wives (anthology), Drylongso.com, Callaloo Journal and Art & Understanding Magazine.

Friday, June 28, 2013

The Door of No Return


I haven’t been able to write for weeks.  I’ve attempted. I have pages and pages of words strung together, but none of it seems right. None of it expresses precisely what I want to say. None of it captures my moodiness, sense of urgency, restlessness, sadness, and discomfort. I can’t put a finger on it, let alone write about it.
My dreams are strange – secret missions, magic, journeys, Ricky Ricardo (not Desi Arnaz), mystery, murder, and chaos. They are an every morning occurrence in the quiet minutes before my alarm sounds. Some mornings I am relieved by the beeping of the alarm, and other days I wish to slide back into my alternate universe.
Most of my conversations and posts to FaceBook these days are political in nature. They center on equal rights and immigration and the Supreme Court decisions and reproductive health and jobs and health care and scandals and gun laws and the Democrats and the Republicans and the liberals and the conservatives and the poor and the wealthy and the minorities and the majority and the great divide in our country.
Sometimes Ronald says, “I know how much you want to talk about this (or that), but I can’t anymore. Not right now. I’ve lived this stuff my whole life. It hasn’t changed.”
He’s right. I’ve lived some stuff for parts of my life and other stuff for all of my life, and I understand how it can become overwhelming, how it can blot out what little light we have during our time on this earth because the stuff of which we speak is darkness and hatred and separation and blindness and ignorance and judgment and intolerance.
Can we alleviate ignorance? I believe sometimes ignorance is willful.
Can we erase hatred from a person’s mind? I believe it is learned behavior, but sometimes it seems organic, almost genetic, perhaps inherited like one’s ethnic knowing and migration pattern and the lore of the family and group from which it emanates. It’s powerful in that it blinds one from seeing another way, perhaps a better way or more righteous way, and it causes one to lie and to make excuses and to blame the target of the hatred.
Why is it common for some people to believe the following? Poor people are lazy. They don’t want to work. They feel entitled. Black men are suspicious just because they are black. Women need strong white men to make their reproductive health decisions because they can’t handle it on their own. Women don’t own their bodies. Women do not deserve equal pay for equal work. Minorities do not need doors to be opened in the workplace or at institutions of higher education by the law of the land because they are not qualified anyway. Gay people are bad and sinful and an abomination, and they could change if they wanted to. Illegal immigrants don’t want to assimilate. They want to steal our jobs and our country. Muslims are jealous of our freedoms and they are terrorists. Americans are white, and able, and smart, and fair, and deserving.
I am a woman. I am white, ethnically Irish and Italian. I am a Christian with no church affiliation though I spent my first twelve years as a Catholic and a year or two as a Lutheran. I grew up poor and lived on welfare for a short time in my childhood when my father had a heart attack and the doctor was not sure if he could return to work. I’m married to a black man – we are uncertain of his full ethnic makeup but know he is descended from slaves. I am identified as white when I am alone. I am identified as black or other or an abomination when I am with my husband. I made a terrible error in life when I married Ronald thirty years ago and gave birth to interracial twins twenty-nine years ago, at least according to some who feel no shame in letting us know what they think.
So many things are happening right now, personally and collectively, that shock my sensibilities. Each incident feels like a violent assault and my words jumble in my head.
I remember the ‘70s when I met my husband freshman year of college. The possibilities seemed endless. The feminist movement had taught me I was equal to men. The Civil Rights movement meant that we were all equal under the law. It was a new day, and we were unafraid even when stuff happened because we wanted to believe it was just the individual, that the collective thoughts on gender and race had changed.
Almost 40 years later, I know it isn’t just the individual. It’s a collective paranoia and attitude and hatred and fear and anger and wielding of power that makes stuff happen. It’s the collective trashing of whole groups of people and of individuals. It is the deafening silence of the horde that feels no outrage. It is the hurtful reality that no matter what, if you are not part of the majority, you are at risk of being judged differently and unkindly and harmfully and dangerously and fatally.
We are moving backwards quickly and harshly and violently. The movements that propelled women and minorities closer to equality, begun so many ages ago and fought and died for over generations, are stalled, and there is opposing momentum to push them backwards.
And the effort to push us backwards gets more vicious as the stakes go up, and the groups behind the pushback are more open about their intent, proud of their intent, strong in their conviction that some are more equal than others and are more entitled to enjoy this great country.
When we go one step forward toward equality, we are pushed back three steps. The SCOTUS decision to strike down DOMA vs. the SCOTUS decision to strike down the Voting Rights Act – one step forward, three steps back. The proverbial ink is not even dry, and the ones who believe some are more equal than others start the process to make inequality the law.
I am offended by Paula Deen’s tearful apologies on television after she lost her partnerships with several companies including Wal-Mart, Smithfield, Target, Home Depot, and the Food Network. I am offended that she wants me to believe she is the victim. I am offended that she wants me to tell her it is okay if she expresses her racist thoughts or that she took credit for cuisine that was stolen from enslaved people or that she peddled a quick path to diabetes and obesity. I am offended that many Americans believe she has a right to believe that people of a different race are inferior. I am offended that these same Americans claim it is their heritage that makes it righteous.
I am angry Paula Deen used her celebrity and wealth to try to protect her empire when her words and actions were so damaging, not just to the people they personally harmed but to our country that struggles to live up to its best ideals every day and every hour. I am angry that her book sales skyrocketed since this story broke, and I am flabbergasted by one comment out on the Wal-Mart website posted in response to Wal-Mart severing their partnership with Deen, “Way to go in supporting a fellow Southerner.”
What about all the Southerners who are descendents of slaves?
I am offended that some people believe Trayvon Martin didn’t have the right to walk to his father’s house in the rain. They believe he didn’t belong there, much like one of my neighbors who sent an email to the neighborhood saying there was a suspicious black man in the neighborhood carrying a clipboard. So scary! Another neighbor, an octogenarian, walked down her driveway and asked the man what he was doing. He said he was leaving bulletins in mailboxes about a landscape business. He was doing what countless other people working for small businesses do in this city, but because he was black, even in my multicultural neighborhood, it was assumed he was there for ill intent.
I am offended by the cross examination by the defense team of Rachel Jeantel, Trayvon Martin’s friend, who was on the phone with him just seconds before he was shot and killed by George Zimmerman. I am offended by the defense team’s culturally insensitive questions and their effort to discredit her testimony.
I am angry that hardly anyone is asking if Trayvon feared for his life as he was pursued by an aggressive stranger who meant to do him harm. If someone were chasing you, wouldn’t you be fearful?
I am angry the GOP came out and said the striking of DOMA will bring society to a stop. There are so many other things that will stop society long before equality will. If they are worried about the sanctity of marriage, gay couples may be its last hope and bring it back in vogue.
I am angry that many white Southerners feel compelled to comment on my almost 40 years old interracial relationship often and offensively. I am angry that many white people consider themselves racial experts although they have spent their lives pretending they are race-less while assigning those they consider racial by describing them as other and different and negative. They have conversations about how people of color are racist, like the George Zimmerman defense team or Paula Deen or the GOP. They blame the victims of racism instead of the perpetrators and perpetuators of it.
They feel self-righteous, not righteous, in their stance. They are horrible, mean-spirited, vicious, small-minded people. There, I’ve said it. It doesn’t make me feel better. It makes me sad and angry and frustrated and disappointed and tired.
President Obama and his family visited the Door of No Return in Senegal this week. Millions of men, women, and children passed through this door and onto ships that transported them to the Americas where they were sold into slavery. I can only wonder at how powerful a moment that was for him, as I was struck silent just viewing footage of it in the media.
Such a long journey for millions of people, and such a horrible, inhuman fate awaited them. Yet, as a country, we refuse to address our hand in it and the awful legacy that is still evident in race relations today. That’s why my words left me. In 2008 I had hope, and now, each day and each hour, I watch in horror as our country steps through what feels like the door of no return. If only we could stop the horde and take a moment to regroup as one country of equal citizens under the law. Maybe then I’ll find my words again.

This painting helps to illustrate what my words fail to tell


The Obamas at the Door of No Return

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

My Cousin Died



It was 10:50 p.m. and I peddled my exercise bike in front of the TV. House Hunters International occupied my brain so I could peddle for the full forty minutes. The phone rang. The black box announcing caller ID blinked onto the TV screen. Private number.
“It’s late,” I said out loud. “Who’s calling?” I jumped off my seat, ran to the phone, and grabbed the handset just before it went to voice mail.
“Hello?”
“It’s Paul,” the voice said.
I was confused. Paul?  Who?
“My mother, you know, she talked to you on the phone. She died. She had medical problems.”
His mother died? Was it someone from the neighborhood, letting me, the HOA president, know of someone’s death? Was it someone from work or someone I had known in Syracuse? Was it the wrong number? Then I knew. My cousin Maria died.
I said, “I’m so very sorry.” Then I repeated it three more times. Shock rendered me verbally challenged. I could tell he wanted to get off the phone. He wasn’t comfortable. “Will you promise to call me with the details of the funeral? We can’t make it out, but I’d like to know.”
“Yes, uh, good-bye,” he said as he hung up.
I went upstairs, knocked on the man room door, pushed it open, and looked at Ronald sitting in the dark at his computer with his headphones on.
“Maria is dead,” I said.
When his sister Sylvia died, I said the same thing. “Sylvia is dead.” I repeated it when his nephew Yancy committed suicide. “Yancy is dead.” I can’t think of any other way to deliver such a message. He delivered the passing of his grandmother, cousin, sister-in-law, and uncle in much softer words.
The day after Maria died, we each had messages on our cell phones when we got out of the movie. Ronald’s father was at the hospital. I felt a surge of fear. “What else?” I asked myself. “Doesn’t all bad news happen in threes?” I tiptoed through the next few hours waiting for more bad news but my father-in-law was sent home with instructions to call his doctor.
I always knew I had two cousins in California, but I didn’t KNOW them. My family has a legacy of estrangement, and my father’s brother Danny was estranged from the family just as my father was estranged on and off in his life, just as I’ve been estranged from my family and Ronald has been estranged from his family.
My father and his brother committed the ultimate sin, but I was never sure what the sin was exactly. Either it was that they had each married non-Italians or it was simply that they had married at all, as none of the other siblings did. Well, Lenny did. He got a woman pregnant and married her, but the marriage was annulled shortly after it began, and no one spoke of the woman or the son she bore ever again.
My father stayed physically close by the family, remaining in Albany, and taking his lashes as they were handed out. Danny moved across the country and left no forwarding address. When my grandfather died, Aunt Josephine called directory assistance to locate Danny to let him know.
After her father died, Aunt Josephine took a trip to California to meet Danny and his family. She came back with stories. She lambasted Danny’s wife and said she was a spender and she vacuumed in the nude. She was a terrible person, she emphasized over and over, and as I listened, a young teen with waist-length hair, wire rimmed glasses, hip-hugger bell bottoms, and midriff tops, I added a parentheses at the conclusion of the sentence each time she said it: (like your mother). She lambasted my mother, too, carrying on the family legacy of insularity.
Estrangement hung like heavy, dusty drapes around our lives. No one ever thought to take the damn things down, toss them out, and replace them with something that let the light in.
First my father died, then another brother Jimmy died just three months later, then my mother (read about my mother’s passing in Shadesof Blue), and then Danny’s wife. After Danny’s wife died, Aunt Josephine stayed in touch with Danny more regularly.  Danny flew to Albany each July, the only month he considered the place warm enough, to visit for a week. One year I suggested Ronald, Cara, Mackenzie, and I drive to Albany and spend the day so we could meet Uncle Danny, but Aunt Josephine didn't think it would be a good idea.
I wondered if she thought our interracial relationship might be too shocking. Yet Danny’s grandchildren were half Mexican.
Two more brothers died, Rocco and Lenny. I attended Rocco’s funeral, but Ronald didn’t come. Lenny was loud and brash just prior to the funeral Mass. He suggested my brother Rocco, named the same as the uncle who had just passed, was not dressed appropriately to be a pallbearer. It had to do with his beard and his hat and his faded corduroy jacket with the patches on the elbows. But there were only three pallbearers as it was, so Lenny had to relent. At a lunch after the graveside service, he looked at me across the table and demanded, “Which one are you?”
“I’m Dianne,” I answered. He didn’t know us by name because he referred to us as “the retards” when we were growing up, as in “if you didn’t have that wife and all the retards, you’d be doing fine.” He was the uncle who married but had the marriage annulled, and I am certain he did not keep tabs on his son or pay any support.
Some years later I attended Lenny’s funeral, too. The only attendees were my biker brother Andy dressed in his leather Harley Davidson vest, Andy’s second wife, two of his biker friends, dressed much the same as my brother and recruited to be pallbearers, Aunt Josephine, my black husband Ronald, dressed “appropriately” in a suit to be pallbearer number four, and me.
I leaned over and quietly said to Ronald, “See? God has a sense of humor.”
I met my cousin Maria by phone when Aunt Josephine died. I was the executor of Aunt Josephine’s estate, which was ironic because many years before my mother had told me that Aunt Josephine had cut me out of her will. It was during my first estrangement from my family and had to do with the fact that Ronald was black.
I had begun speaking to Uncle Danny a couple of months earlier to let him know that Aunt Josephine had a stroke and had lain on her floor for four days before I called her and then called 911 when she didn’t answer. After my initial call, I called him about once a week to update him on her progress.
Danny and I had some nice conversations. But one time he told me he had cancer, something he had not told Aunt Josephine because he didn’t want to upset her. His voice was mellow, each word chosen carefully. He was nothing like Lenny who had demanded to know which one I was years before at Uncle Rocco’s funeral. My brother Andy recently told me that Danny, whom he met during one of those July visits to Albany, looked like Lenny but acted more like Rocco, quiet and reserved.
One day I called Danny to check on him, and Maria answered the phone. I was on my way home from work, and we talked the whole way, and then some more as I sat in the driveway. She complained about taking care of her father, and how tired she was. I told her I wished there was something I could do, and she told me to come out and spend a few weeks taking care of him so she could have a break.
“I work,” I said. She didn’t. I don’t think she ever did. Aunt Josephine was good at character assassination, and she had assassinated Maria’s character many times over. Her character flaws included drugs, obesity, theft, and older Mexican men.
In the year or so before her stroke, Aunt Josephine brought up her will on occasion during our weekly calls, and I never wanted to talk about it.  Years before when she claimed to have cut me out of it if I didn’t break up with Ronald, I chose him over inheritance so I really didn’t have much interest. Rather I liked speaking to her about some of everything like bad drivers and criminals and how no one had respect any more. I didn’t want to think about her dying. I’d already seen too many people die, and I have abandonment issues, so every time someone dies I take it personally.
Besides I told her the Church was the right and good heir of her money, but she was having none of it. She wanted to know what I thought about setting up a trust fund for Maria. She didn’t think she could handle getting so much money at once. After all, she reminded me, she had stolen credit cards and jewelry from her father’s apartment. I still didn’t want to talk about it, and I had no concern with what Maria might do with her inheritance, so I changed the subject and told her how some stupid guy had cut me off on the way to work.
After I talked to Maria about her father that time she began to call me regularly.
“She’s not high functioning,” I told my sister when my sister and I were still speaking to one another.
Then Danny died just as my aunt’s will went into probate. Aunt Josephine thought she had fixed Maria’s problem about money by naming Danny as the heir to her portion, but she didn’t account for family dynamics and legacies. When my father died, my Uncle Jimmy, his brother, died just three months later. My mother passed eighteen months after my father’s death. Uncle Danny copied his brother Jimmy and died three months after Aunt Josephine died. There are some strong emotions roiling around in estranged families and dramatic events cause other equally dramatic events to occur.
Maria was her father’s sole heir. Her brother Danny had died in the ‘80s of AIDS. Aunt Josephine had been sure to tell me that his “girlfriend” took care of him at the end of his life.
“I don’t think he was a homosexual,” she said, using the girlfriend as proof. Maybe she forgot that she told me how his mother gushed over him that first time Aunt Josephine went out there to visit, how mother and son stood at the closet together picking out dresses to wear, and how his mother had more in common with him than she did with Maria.
“Maybe,” I said.
There were legal issues to resolve since Uncle Danny died while the will was in probate. Maria had trouble understanding the paperwork.  I encouraged her to hire an attorney out there. She went to a legal aid establishment instead, not like a non-profit legal aid, but a for profit that was purposely established in a poor neighborhood. I tried to call the woman assisting her a couple of times, and I found out she was not an attorney and did not know what she was doing.
“I can’t pay more money than I’m getting to get this done,” Maria said. She was ready to give up.
I asked my attorney to find and hire an attorney to help her. He said he would take the cost out of her portion of the inheritance. She got the letter from the hired attorney that stated his fee. She blew up. She yelled at me on the phone. She wanted to just return any money coming to her. I started laughing.
“Calm down,” I said. “You misread the letter. You aren’t getting two thousand. That’s what the attorney is getting. You are getting almost forty thousand.”
She laughed, too. Later, when I paid out the estate and sent her the check, she called to tell me she used some of the money to purchase a plot at Forest Lawn and a pre-paid funeral. I didn’t want to talk about that either. It let me know she was thinking about dying.
Instead we talked about a lot other things, like movies and our kids and my husband Ronald. She called Ronald “Whiney” but she never judged him for suffering from depression, like a lot of family members did. She would tell me to hand him the phone and she’d talk to him for an hour or more about stuff, anything that popped into their heads. Ronald always felt better after the phone calls, especially when she threatened to come to North Carolina and kick his ass.
She started sending us stuff, too. I discovered Maria had made one of the afghans I had taken from Aunt Josephine’s house when I was clearing it out to sell it. I told her how much Ronald loved it; how he wrapped it around him when he was on his computer in the man room. She asked me what my favorite color is, and soon a beautiful red afghan was delivered to my doorstep.
Then other boxes arrived. One was filled with toys for my dog Ru. After that he recognized the pre-paid USPS boxes addressed to “The Haggins” (she never spelled our name correctly), and he would run around them and bark, because he was sure they were for him.
Once two boxes arrived, and when I pushed them into the house from the porch, I heard the contents knocking around. I opened the boxes and found piles of broken Hallmark kitsch.  They had been holiday decorations like pumpkins and Santa Claus statues, but she had not used any excelsior. She had just piled them into the boxes. Cara claimed some of the pieces to use as props in a play she had written and was just about to perform. It was about found pieces in a junkyard and the stories they told. The rest went in the trash, but I made sure to call Maria and thank her.
She sent knitted, fingerless gloves in black for Ronald and red for me. Each time I return to Syracuse in the fall or winter, I throw one or two pairs into my suitcase. There were six in each color, and I wonder what I will do when I have gone through all of them. Maybe I will have to use the many pairs of knitted slippers she sent.
Another day a box of sixty knitted squares arrived. They were all different colors and patterns. Mackenzie sewed them together, with the patience she has for such activities, and she and Cara used the resulting quilt in one of their performances titled Eve at the River.
There were handmade rugs of Easter Lilies and Cardinals, the backs rubberized in thick, swirled patterns as if someone had used a palm to spread the goop on them. She mailed five boxes of DVDs. She sent baby blankets for future grandchildren, stuffed animals for every holiday, and a scary, blond, and blue-eyed doll.  The stuffed animals line the dresser top in the guest room. I had hopes she would visit one day.
I let Mackenzie pick through the DVDs and take what she wanted, and I kept the rest for a while; then threw them out. The doll sat on the kitchen island for a few days. I couldn’t bring myself to throw it out. Ru was convinced it was for him. He tried his best to reach the counter so he could abscond it. When I moved it to the shelf in the coat closet, he sat vigil for a week, plotting and planning his way to stealing it. He was sure it contained a squeaker like his other toys, and he was in search and destroy mode. Every once in a while the doll catches his eye when I am in the closet to grab a coat or take out the vacuum, and he still has plans for it.
My siblings, Andy and Peggy, and I helped Aunt Josephine clean out Uncle Lenny’s house, then we and Ronald cleaned out Aunt Josephine’s house. At Uncle Lenny’s house, every time I thought Aunt Josephine wasn’t looking, I told Andy to take as much stuff as possible to the trash pile. We knew that everything she kept would someday have to be sorted through again. And so it was.
Not only did she have Uncle Lenny’s stuff, she also had sixty years worth of kitsch in her house. We threw a lot of it out. I gave all the religious statues – the Infants of Prague, Mary Mother of Jesus, and some other saints – to a friend. I gave the set of Italian record albums from the 1940s to the healing priest who visited my aunt at the nursing home. I let the attorney take a set of pots that his daughter-in-law wanted to use in her classroom.  Some of Andy’s friends helped, and I let them choose things to take. I only kept a few things for memory including a pale green glass dish circa 1930s. It probably cost a dime when it was new.
I sent Maria a package with a pair of diamond earrings that belonged to her mother. The receipt for the resetting of the diamonds was folded into the tiny box I found them in, and it had her mother’s name and address on it. I’m not sure how they came into Aunt Josephine’s possession. Maybe Danny wanted to make sure they were safe since Maria allegedly stole and sold some other pieces of her mother’s jewelry.
Another time I sent her photographs of Ronald, Cara, Mackenzie and me. Then I sent her some knitting books. I also mailed her a photo album with the pictures Aunt Josephine took on her first visit to California. Maria was about fourteen at the time.
“I look like our grandmother,” she said as we discussed the photographs. I tried to picture her as a woman in her fifties. Neither one of us knew our grandmother. She had died several years before we were born. I had seen photographs of her. I called her the Queen of Hearts, the character from Alice in Wonderland. She looked mean even if she was only 4’10”.
She and my mother didn’t get along. She cursed my mother in Italian every time she saw her.  My mother asked an Italian friend what the curse meant, and her friend told her it translated as “I hope you burst.” The next time my grandmother leveled it at her, my mother looked right into her eyes (a definite downward stare) and said in English, “And I hope you burst, too, all over your goddamned new carpet.”
I found my grandmother’s death certificate as I cleaned out Aunt Josephine’s house. It stated cause of death as a brain aneurysm.
Maria had cataracts and knitting became difficult for her, so the packages stopped coming a few years ago. She was nearly blind. I wondered what was happening when things arrived with dropped stitches and messy backings. It took almost two years for Medicaid to approve the surgery for just one eye. She waited and waited for her other eye to be approved, but she would die before the surgery was ever scheduled.
Maria had two boys, now grown men, named Peter and Paul. I guess the old Mexican was their father, and he had died long before she and I began talking. I don’t know if Maria went to Church, but she was religious. I imagined if she had more boys, she would have continued to name them after the Apostles. Matthew, Luke, Mark and John, maybe Judas, though I can’t imagine the fate awaiting that child.  I can’t remember the rest. I am estranged from the Catholic Church, too.
I arranged to give confession before Aunt Josephine’s funeral Mass. I knew how much she wanted me back in the Church, and I loved the times when I was visiting and we walked down her block together to the Church she had attended for sixty years to go to Mass. Organized religion scares me in the way it attempts to control, but I’ve always found Mass very comforting.
In the room where the priest put on his vestments, I gave my confession. We did not sit in booths with our vision obstructed by screens and darkness. We sat in chairs facing one another out in the open. I started crying as soon as I uttered, “Bless me Father for I have sinned.”
I was embarrassed that I hadn’t given confession in thirty-five years, and that he could look into my eyes and know if I were lying or telling the truth. And I was angry that Aunt Josephine had abandoned me.
I partook of the Body of Christ during Holy Communion but refused the Blood of Christ. They didn’t let parishioners partake of the wine back when I went to Church as a child, and I was shocked they allowed it in 2005, especially for an estranged Catholic like me.
The priest and the attorney convinced me to try St. Lucy’s Church in Syracuse. They were hoping I’d wander back into the fold. I went one Sunday with a friend. The Church, situated right in the middle of the housing projects Ronald grew up in, was a progressive Church. Everyone was welcome to partake in Holy Communion. I didn’t go up, and I never went back.
For the next few years I donated money at Christmas to the school at Aunt Josephine’s Church in memoriam.
Maria stopped calling me sometime late in 2010. I didn’t receive a Christmas card from her. I started calling her instead of her calling me. I left increasingly urgent voice messages wondering what happened to her. I beseeched her sons that if they were checking her messages would they please call me and let me know if she was okay.
Finally, just as I began searching the Los Angeles obits, she called me from the hospital, her voice weak, her spirit deflated. She had sepsis, at least that is what I surmised, as she had not the words to describe her illness, and had almost died. I asked to speak directly to her son Paul (I’ve never spoken to Peter; never heard him in the background as I had heard Paul countless times) because he had told her I wouldn’t know who he was if he called me, so he didn’t. I asked him to please call me in the future anytime his mother couldn’t. He promised he would.
I remembered that as I ran names through my head trying to think who was telling me his mother was dead. I blamed it on the “private number” caller ID. I was furious at myself for not recognizing him immediately. I decided I was not high functioning.
The next day I wondered if I had been as good a friend as Maria had been to me. I burned with regret. I cried. Ronald assured me that she would not have received her inheritance without my determined effort. Cara thought I had been a very good friend indeed. Mackenzie felt sorry I had lost my cousin.
I’m still wondering if I even know how to be a good friend.
Paul called to tell me the details of the funeral. It sounds small and simple. I asked him how he was doing, and he said he was okay. I asked him his last name. I didn’t know it. He spelled it for me. Then I asked him if he planned to keep his mother’s PO box and he said, yes.
I don’t know if I can be a friend to Paul, but I know I’m going to try to be a good second cousin. All else gets lost in the kitsch of our lives, and that’s how estrangement happens.
Paul called me again today, hours before I was going to post this on my blog page. He was confused and angry with the cemetery staff. He wasn’t sure what he needed to do to get everything straightened out.  I asked him if his brother was helping him, and he said he had spoken to him once since Maria’s death, but he didn’t want to rely on him or call him again. I surmised they are estranged.
He asked if I would help him. I said, yes.



 Me in my First Holy Communion attire


 (Left to right): Jimmy, Carmella (who passed away shortly after this photo was taken), my grandmother The Queen of Hearts, Danny, my grandfather, my father Frank, and Lenny. Aunt Josephine and Uncle Rocco were not born yet.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Funny Vibe




No, I'm not gonna rob you
No, I'm not gonna beat you
No, I'm not gonna rape you
So why you want to give me that
Funny Vibe!

No, I'm not gonna hurt you
No, I'm not gonna harm you
And I try not to hate you
So why you want to give me that
Funny Vibe!
~ Funny Vibe, Living Colour, 1988

Sometimes I wish I could remember what it was like before I was race conscious. Blissfully ignorant, I believed racism had been outlawed with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
I can’t claim ignorance anymore. The more I witness and experience, the more I realize that in our current collective frame of mind, racism is insurmountable and true change and true equality are a cruel fantasy.
I am not cynical, just weary.  I see the same weariness in my husband Ronald (for new readers, I am white and Ronald is black. We’ve been together for nearly 40 years.).
Ronald says, “Why do you write about this? It won’t change anything. It will only upset you.”
I’m already upset by it, though. Writing helps me to process it. As weary as I am over the whole thing, as hopeless as it feels, I want to make it better. I’d rather try to make change than tacitly perpetuate racism through inaction.
When Ronald is at his saddest he says, “I’ve seen too much.”
He is referring to when he was growing up in the projects on the Westside of Syracuse and then, later, when he served the community as a firefighter for 25 years and assisted people in crisis. The images are burned into his soul, and they live alongside me. I can’t turn them out. They are valid and real. They have a right to be here.
Watching media stories about the very white institution known as the PGA attacking Tiger Woods for “the drop” and Vijay Singh for “deer antler spray use,” Ronald recalled how certain officers on the fire department wanted to ruin his reputation and bring him shame just because they didn’t want him there. Their hatred, judgments, and actions against him had nothing to do with Ronald’s performance or abilities, but everything to do with the color of his skin. As a witness I felt immense sadness, helplessness, and anger. The same story is played out over and over, and it doesn’t matter if one is rich or famous or the best in the world at something or even the President of the United States. Skin color makes it so.
Everyone will remember that Tiger Woods took “the drop” at the 2013 Masters in Augusta, but they won’t remember that it was found to be a legal drop and that he did not have an unfair advantage.  They won’t remember that it was the PGA committee who determined the drop was legal and failed to let him know prior to signing his scorecard that a television spectator had called in a report of unfair play precipitating an investigation. They won’t remember how uncanny it was for the PGA committee to reverse its decision the next morning. They won’t remember that Tiger Woods is the number one golfer in the world because of his work ethic, drive, focus, and ability. They’ll only remember the commentators, Nick Faldo and Brandel Chamblee, calling for him to disqualify himself in a manner that suggested to me they might as well have worn white hoods and carried torches.  They’ll remember that deep down inside, they don’t think Tiger Woods deserves the title of the number one golfer in the world. Skin color makes it so.
I cringe when I hear about the kinds of attacks waged against President Obama. For a certain percentage of Americans, there is nothing he can do that is right. Hear them tell it, he doesn’t represent them. He is a tyrannical monster who orchestrated the Boston Marathon bombing and who plans to take America away from the very people who most deserve it – white people. Skin color makes it so.
It’s the mundane things, too. Like when we went out to eat the other night and the very nice, young, white waitress did not look or speak directly to Ronald the whole evening. She asked if we wanted separate checks and separate plates for our shared dessert, not just once, but several times, as if she wondered about my sanity, as if she could not imagine why we were seated at the same table, let alone sharing the same food and knocking spoons.
Her final attempt at figuring out the situation resulted in her handing Ronald’s credit card back to me instead of him. The scenario did not compute in her world. It ruined our evening. Skin color makes it so.
Then there are the events that change one’s life and one’s sense of self. They are specters that haunt continually and cast gray shadows that snuff out one’s spark.
I saw such a specter this past week as it hovered over my father-in-law. He has dementia, which is sad enough as we struggle with the loss of knowing him and of him knowing us.
“Who are you?” he asked me several times over the week.
Each time I patiently answered, “I’m Dianne, your number one daughter-in-law.” Sometimes he was fine and knew exactly who I was and minutes later, he didn’t.
One evening we piled into the car, with Ronald driving, to go to the carpet store to order new carpet for my in-laws’ bedroom. When we got inside the store, the salesman who approached us must have reminded my father-in-law of one of his supervisors from over 60 years ago.
“I’ve got something I need to say to him,” he said after I had led him to a chair so he could sit and his legs wouldn’t hurt so much. “I didn’t steal that loaf of bread.”
“He knows that now,” I said. “It’s been straightened out.”
“I want to tell him myself,” he said.
I know he didn’t steal that bread 60 years ago when he was a young father who moved his family up North so they could have a better life. One of his first jobs was at the Millbrook Bread Company. Like my father, he would not pick up a dime off the street if it didn’t belong to him. The truth doesn’t matter because that supervisor believed my father-in-law must have been the one that took that bread, and 60 years later the humiliation and anger are clear while other more dear memories are lost. Skin color makes it so.
When people are judged by the color of their skin, the scars go deeper than memory and time and space. They don’t fade. They embody pain, humiliation, depression, and anger. Skin color makes it so.
I’m sensitive to this, but that’s because racism is a chameleon, manifesting itself in different guises. My blissful ignorance is long gone, and I cannot recall how it felt. I am frequently offended, especially living down in the South where the attitudes seem infinitesimally different from the attitudes of the Jim Crow era. I am offended when people tell me not to take it seriously or to consider the source or that not everyone thinks that way or that I should just get over it. I can’t. I won’t. I’ve seen too much.
Instead I get that funny vibe like at the restaurant the other night or when white people stop and stare at us like we are engaged in something so unbelievable and abhorrent that they are going to post it on Facebook later and talk about it for the next year. Skin color makes it so.

The scars on this escaped slave’s back are painfully visible. This photo of Gordon was taken in 1862.

This is just one of the many subliminally racist images flooding the Internet. This is a target that bleeds when shot.  It eerily resembles President Obama. Looking at it gives me that funny vibe.